Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 4:26:15 GMT -5
Some of the challenges that organized volunteering will face in 2013 can be grouped into several themes, such as: greater call for people who provide volunteer service, improve associations, strengthen the professionalization of volunteer resources, diversify and promote volunteering, evaluate and measure the impact and communication of voluntary social action. Some of these remains will depend on the capacity of the CSO-citizenship, Volunteering and Business, CSO-government relations. Let's see why. In the first relationship, CSO – citizenship, the main challenge corresponds to the capacity for action that the institutions develop in the next year to truly establish links with people who wish to volunteer in the organizations that need them. It seems trite, but in truth this is a responsibility of civil associations to account for advancing professionalism to develop profiles according to simple activities where new volunteers feel comfortable and can begin to contribute. If organizations do not invest time in organizing and systematizing their needs to receive volunteers, they will not be able to move forward. Today there are more resources that make it easier to start a volunteer program well and the portal has become an extraordinary tool to connect to the world of volunteer work offers.
Every week, with rigorous discipline, service Phone Number List areas are offered, not all of them are attractive, but there is consistency so that people consult the portal. There we see a lack of ingenuity, attractive profiling and expressing what a person gains by volunteering within an institution. Regarding the challenge of improving associationism, the protagonists of this challenge are the CSOs themselves and the other sectors. It is necessary to further encourage a win-win vision, thinking about a greater good that is community well-being and improving quality of life conditions. However, associationism could lead to the strengthening of associations that work with voluntary groups for their professionalization. There are Ezer, Amevol and other efforts such as Causas and the occasional volunteer network. But formally, with their decent exceptions, voluntary strengthening institutions need to invest time and work in consolidating the services they provide: CSOs require guidance and support to strengthen their programs, but also data, research, advice and shortcuts to enhance strength. of the voluntary social action that they are beginning to call for. More trainers and promoters are required.
From this point of view all types of volunteering are necessary and thirsty for these services, in such a way that strengthening volunteering organizations have the opportunity to support different groups such as public volunteering (DIF, secretariats, etc.), university volunteering , corporate, volunteering in churches, informal groups such as neighborhood associations, settlers, fathers and mothers, etc. It is important to note that associations, like other fields of the philanthropic sector, face a ghost, a terrible ogre that seduces a large part of the volunteers, sirens that sweeten tempting songs. Directors, employers, managers, directors and even consultants and founders of organizations fall into the temptation of taking center stage and do not let go, delegate or share triumphs. Protagonism obscures, limits, confronts, weakens and distorts efforts to professionalize, modernize and consolidate voluntary groups and civil organizations. In “Citizenship in Construction” we will publish, when the text is mature, a special article that we will share with the intention of understanding the sociological aspects that explain it, but also the counterparts that would allow us to overcome those seductive songs of the sirens of protagonism and advance in the consolidation of institutional processes. Regarding the issue of professionalism, those involved in this area are undoubtedly: the CSOs themselves, strengthening associations, consultants, universities and trainers. There are better materials, content, courses and more trainers.
Every week, with rigorous discipline, service Phone Number List areas are offered, not all of them are attractive, but there is consistency so that people consult the portal. There we see a lack of ingenuity, attractive profiling and expressing what a person gains by volunteering within an institution. Regarding the challenge of improving associationism, the protagonists of this challenge are the CSOs themselves and the other sectors. It is necessary to further encourage a win-win vision, thinking about a greater good that is community well-being and improving quality of life conditions. However, associationism could lead to the strengthening of associations that work with voluntary groups for their professionalization. There are Ezer, Amevol and other efforts such as Causas and the occasional volunteer network. But formally, with their decent exceptions, voluntary strengthening institutions need to invest time and work in consolidating the services they provide: CSOs require guidance and support to strengthen their programs, but also data, research, advice and shortcuts to enhance strength. of the voluntary social action that they are beginning to call for. More trainers and promoters are required.
From this point of view all types of volunteering are necessary and thirsty for these services, in such a way that strengthening volunteering organizations have the opportunity to support different groups such as public volunteering (DIF, secretariats, etc.), university volunteering , corporate, volunteering in churches, informal groups such as neighborhood associations, settlers, fathers and mothers, etc. It is important to note that associations, like other fields of the philanthropic sector, face a ghost, a terrible ogre that seduces a large part of the volunteers, sirens that sweeten tempting songs. Directors, employers, managers, directors and even consultants and founders of organizations fall into the temptation of taking center stage and do not let go, delegate or share triumphs. Protagonism obscures, limits, confronts, weakens and distorts efforts to professionalize, modernize and consolidate voluntary groups and civil organizations. In “Citizenship in Construction” we will publish, when the text is mature, a special article that we will share with the intention of understanding the sociological aspects that explain it, but also the counterparts that would allow us to overcome those seductive songs of the sirens of protagonism and advance in the consolidation of institutional processes. Regarding the issue of professionalism, those involved in this area are undoubtedly: the CSOs themselves, strengthening associations, consultants, universities and trainers. There are better materials, content, courses and more trainers.